Dispute Over Investment Strategy and Shareholder Confidence
YZi Labs has formally issued a rectification notice to 10X Capital, accusing the firm of mismanagement and transparency issues that have negatively impacted shareholder confidence. YZi Labs, a significant stakeholder in CEA Industries, is demanding adherence to the agreed-upon BNB strategy. This stands in contrast to 10X Capital's reported pivot towards other cryptocurrencies, such as Solana.
This dispute highlights the potential risks inherent in cryptocurrency governance and has already resulted in a significant decline in BNC’s stock value.
Accusations of Breaching Fiduciary Duties
In a detailed confrontation, YZi Labs, which is reportedly linked to Binance founder Changpeng Zhao, announced a formal notice to 10X Capital for alleged mismanaging CEA Industries. The rectification notice accuses 10X Capital of disregarding previous asset management agreements, which has had a detrimental effect on BNC's strategic commitments.
YZi Labs has formally issued a rectification notice to 10X Capital over serious breaches of fiduciary duty and lack of transparency.
Major shareholders like YZi Labs, which possesses a 5% stake in BNC, claim that 10X Capital is planning to shift investments away from BNB and towards Solana. This proposed move is characterized as a breach of fiduciary duties, consequently raising concerns among investors regarding potential conflicts of interest.
Market Impact and Investor Confidence
The immediate consequences of this announcement included a stock price drop exceeding 10%, compounding an existing 89% year-to-date decline. Investor confidence in BNC’s leadership and its strategic direction has been severely undermined.
Financial Implications and Regulatory Scrutiny
Financially, BNC was in the process of a $500 million PIPE deal, an initiative designed to facilitate the expansion of BNB asset management. The reported strategic shift by 10X Capital poses a threat to these investments, impacting BNB’s valuation and its overall asset allocation strategy.
This situation could potentially lead to regulatory scrutiny, further emphasizing the ongoing debate surrounding transparency in cryptocurrency governance. Observers suggest that such activist interventions might compel affected companies to realign with their agreed-upon strategic focus, thereby influencing valuation and investor trust.

