Lawmakers in Wisconsin have introduced Assembly Bill 471 (AB471), a proposal that could reshape the state’s crypto landscape by exempting certain digital asset activities from money transmitter licensing requirements.
If enacted, the measure would remove regulatory hurdles for individuals and businesses engaged in Bitcoin mining, staking, software development, and blockchain transactions.
Wisconsin’s Push for Regulatory Clarity
AB471, introduced by seven Republican representatives and two Senate co‑sponsors, outlines specific exemptions for activities that traditionally raised licensing concerns.
Under the proposal:
- •Crypto mining and staking would not require a money transmitter license.
- •Blockchain software development and node operation would be explicitly permitted.
- •Exchanging digital assets would be exempt if not converted into U.S. dollars or deposited with banks.
- •Individuals could legally accept digital assets for goods and services and maintain self‑hosted or hardware wallets without restriction.
- •The bill also protects participants from local bans, preventing state agencies or municipalities from restricting digital asset payments or custody.
Current Progress of AB471
The measure has been referred to the Committee on Financial Institutions and currently sits at 25% progress. To become law, it must pass through both chambers and additional committee reviews.
Supporters argue that the legislation would position Wisconsin as a blockchain‑friendly hub, encouraging mining, staking, and tech innovation while reducing compliance costs for startups.
National Context: States Taking Their Own Paths
Across the U.S., crypto regulation remains fragmented, with some states actively courting blockchain businesses while others impose stricter licensing. Wisconsin’s proposal echoes moves by states like Wyoming, which has pioneered blockchain‑friendly legislation.
By clarifying exemptions, Wisconsin aims to reduce legal uncertainty and create a more predictable business environment for cryptocurrency entrepreneurs.
If successful, AB471 could set a precedent for other states grappling with how to regulate Bitcoin businesses without stifling growth.