Why Kaspa (KAS) Is Not Yet on Binance: Alleged Listing Demand Raises Eyebrows

A question in many KAS holders’ minds would be why Kaspa, one of the fastest-growing proof-of-work projects, is still not listed on Binance. The situation has taken several turns over time and continues to raise curiosity.

The discussion intensified on an X post after comments shared by a member of the Kaspa team, which added new context to an already long-running topic.

Kaspa Listing Conversation Began With Questions Around Its Technology

Kaspa attracted attention due to its unique proof-of-work approach known as GHOSTDAG. This generated excitement because the technology gives the network fast confirmation speeds without sacrificing security. Many observers expected Binance to pick it up quickly due to strong community growth.

KAS Price climbed steadily during different market phases, which pushed the topic forward. The early conversation suggested that Binance might have been waiting to see more about the technology. Some felt the chain might still be too new.

The topic resurfaced again later, this time focusing on Kaspa price strength and expanding miner interest. This made some think the project had matured enough for major listing consideration.

The conversation later moved beyond the technology. This time it centered on the belief that the way Kaspa grew did not match the typical process seen among new exchange listings. There were questions about how the project positioned itself. KAS Price performance encouraged some to speculate that a major exchange listing would soon follow.

The topic then paused until the next twist arrived, leading to the most recent explanation.

Kaspa Price And Binance Listing Discussion Changed After New Claim

Wolfie, whose public bio states responsibility for Business Development and Listings for Kaspa, compared the situation to a platform holding a vote for Movie of the Year only to not have the winning movie available to watch.

This sparked a chain of replies. One response came from Juan Matejčič. He expressed concern about whether Kaspa would appear on top platforms such as Coinbase, OKX, and Crypto.com. He believed failure to secure major exchange support could slow the project. Another message followed from an account claiming that securing a listing fee would help the project.

Wolfie responded to the cost topic. He explained that the fee would not be a small amount. He stated the request involved a percentage of the token supply.

He mentioned the amount was 3% of the maximum supply. His example calculation referenced 28,700,000,000 maximum supply multiplied by 3%, which would equal 861,000,000 KAS. Based on his estimate, this size would represent about $41,112,750.

This shifted the conversation from speculation into a specific concern. The level of demand claimed made some reconsider why Kaspa had not been listed. The request appeared large enough that Kaspa did not move forward.

Kaspa Price Discussion Expanded After Insight From Community Figures

Another voice, named Vijay Kailash, joined the discussion. He explained that this expectation from Binance was the main obstacle. He also noted that Kaspa’s ability to grow into a multibillion-dollar network without paying anyone suggested strong grassroots strength. His view encouraged users to study Kaspa rather than expect instant listings.

His remark further motivated interest around KAS Price movement. Some readers saw the comment as reinforcement that Kaspa might continue growing regardless of exchange support.

Kaspa Price And The Future Of The Listing Question

The story began with questions around Kaspa technology. It later moved toward speculation about process. Now it focuses on the size of the demand allegedly made by Binance.

Many now understand that a listing is not only a technical decision but also a negotiation. The request from Binance, if accurate, represents a large commitment. This leaves Kaspa in a position where the team chooses whether the cost aligns with the project’s goals.