VanEck CEO Jan van Eck has sparked fresh debate across the crypto industry after raising concerns about Bitcoin’s long-term security and privacy architecture. Speaking in a recent CNBC interview, van Eck said the firm could “walk away” from Bitcoin if future technological shifts undermine its “fundamental logic.” His comments have drawn strong reactions from technologists, investors, and Bitcoin advocates.
Bitcoin’s Encryption Faces Future Quantum Computing Risk
During the interview, van Eck questioned whether Bitcoin’s current encryption standards can withstand the eventual rise of quantum-capable machines. The CEO emphasized that while the threat is not immediate, the potential arrival of powerful quantum computers within the next decade could weaken or break existing cryptographic protections.
This is not the first time the issue has been raised. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin and several cybersecurity researchers have repeatedly warned that quantum security is a critical challenge for all blockchains, including Bitcoin. Developers are exploring quantum-resistant upgrades, but van Eck’s comments suggest institutional investors are increasingly paying attention to the timeline.
VanEck CEO Jan van Eck on CNBC:
“There’s something else going on within the Bitcoin community that non-crypto people need to know about.
And that is: ultimately, VanEck has been around before Bitcoin. We will walk away from Bitcoin if we think the thesis is fundamentally… pic.twitter.com/pCUtuqBVHD
— Arjun Khemani (@arjunkhemani) November 22, 2025
Growing Privacy Expectations Put Pressure on Bitcoin
Beyond encryption, van Eck pointed to rising expectations for privacy-preserving digital assets. Bitcoin’s transparent ledger, while valuable for auditability and security, offers little transaction privacy. According to van Eck, some long-time Bitcoin investors are now evaluating privacy-oriented alternatives such as Zcash, which offers shielded transactions and stronger confidentiality features.
Van Eck reiterated his stance on X, linking the current downturn in Bitcoin sentiment to both the quantum-computing debate and the broader push toward privacy-focused cryptographic design.
VanEck Would Exit Bitcoin If Its Core Thesis Breaks
The CEO made it clear that VanEck’s long-term position in Bitcoin is not unconditional. If the firm concludes that Bitcoin’s underlying technology cannot be upgraded to withstand future cryptographic threats, van Eck says they would be prepared to completely exit their investment.
This level of candor is unusual among major ETF issuers and has intensified discussion around how institutions evaluate existential risks in digital assets.
Industry Reaction: Concern, Pushback, and Technical Clarifications
Van Eck’s remarks have triggered divided reactions. Some technologists and cryptographers agree that the quantum threat deserves more mainstream attention and praise the CEO for highlighting a realistic long-term risk.
Bitcoin advocates, however, argue that the concern is overstated and note that Bitcoin developers have already mapped out potential post-quantum upgrade paths. They emphasize that no near-term quantum hardware can break Bitcoin’s encryption, and that the network is capable of implementing hard forks or soft forks to transition to quantum-resistant algorithms if needed.
The conversation also reinvigorated privacy debates, with renewed focus on technologies such as zero-knowledge proofs, script upgrades, and potential future proposals that could bring stronger privacy to Bitcoin without compromising its regulatory compatibility.