These Kaspa Community Mistakes Could Hold Back KAS Price Growth

According to analyst Jens Illgner, the Kaspa community might be inadvertently slowing down the growth of KAS price by focusing their efforts in unproductive directions.

Illgner believes a significant misstep is the community's tendency to try and prove Kaspa's superiority over Bitcoin. This approach can alienate Bitcoin supporters, creating resistance rather than fostering new adoption.

The core of his argument is that Kaspa does not need to directly compete with Bitcoin to establish its own unique value proposition. While both utilize proof-of-work consensus mechanisms, Kaspa introduces distinct innovations. Illgner proposes positioning Kaspa as "digital silver," a complementary asset rather than a direct Bitcoin replacement. This analogy is further supported by the Aramaic origin of the name Kaspa, which means silver.

The comparison to gold and silver highlights their different roles and values. Gold is recognized for its rarity and store of value, while silver is valued for its practicality and accessibility. This positioning allows Kaspa to complement Bitcoin's strengths without engaging in direct competition.

Building Strength Through Unity and Focus

Illgner emphasizes that the Kaspa community already possesses significant strengths, including a wealth of talented content creators, educators, and analysts with deep project understanding. The primary need, he suggests, is better coordination and a more unified focus.

He points out that with over 500,000 KAS holders, the current marketing efforts appear fragmented. By consolidating creativity and resources, the community could cultivate a more compelling narrative that resonates with new investors. Illgner also notes the importance of simplicity in communication, as many outside the crypto space are more interested in clear benefits and accessibility than complex technical details.

The Role of Unity and Simplicity in KAS Price Growth

For the KAS price to appreciate, Illgner advises the community to prioritize storytelling and collaboration over debates. He draws a parallel to projects like Cardano, which experienced rapid growth during previous bull markets by effectively conveying simple and relatable concepts to a broad audience.

Holders are also reminded of the importance of patience. Just as Bitcoin took 12 years to achieve a trillion-dollar market capitalization, Kaspa's price growth will require sustained effort and time. The focus should be on consistent progress and a shared vision, rather than on rivalry or speculative hype.

Illgner concludes by encouraging a shift in perspective, moving away from a "Bitcoin vs. Kaspa" mindset towards a "Gold vs. Silver" analogy. This subtle change in framing could potentially lead to wider adoption and more sustainable growth for Kaspa.

If Kaspa can successfully embrace its unique identity and foster greater internal unity, it stands a strong chance of thriving in the next phase of cryptocurrency expansion. Ultimately, progress in this space often hinges on collective strength and proving one's own value, rather than solely on outcompeting others.