The debate over Bitcoin’s long-term dominance has intensified as blockchain adoption matures. Investors are no longer focused only on store-of-value assets. They are now examining real utility, speed, and institutional integration. That shift has created space for a serious comparison between Bitcoin and XRP, especially as global finance demands faster and cheaper settlement rails.
In a recent video posted on X, Levi Rietveld of Crypto Crusaders reignited the debate. He argued that XRP holds structural advantages that position it for outsized growth.
Levi stated that “XRP is going to be bigger than Bitcoin, and it is so freaking obvious.” His comments have sparked fresh interest in how the two assets compare in terms of utility and financial integration.
Technology and Transaction Speed
XRP uses a unique consensus mechanism that settles transactions in about four seconds. This speed positions it as a practical tool for cross-border payments and real-time financial operations.
IT'S OBVIOUS! $XRP WILL BE BIGGER THAN BITCOIN!
Comment “knowledge” and I’ll DM you access to my community!
Like & repost to spread awareness!! pic.twitter.com/ZkiKYQt3L8
— Levi | Crypto Crusaders (@LeviRietveld) December 4, 2025
Bitcoin, by contrast, relies on proof-of-work mining, which produces slower confirmation times. Because of this slower design, Bitcoin is less suitable for high-volume payment activity, even though it reinforces its store-of-value narrative.
Cost Efficiency and Scalability
Transaction costs on the XRP Ledger remain extremely low. The network was built for efficiency at scale, allowing thousands of transactions with minimal fees. Bitcoin’s fees can increase sharply during periods of network congestion. This makes small or frequent payments less practical for users who require predictable and inexpensive settlement.
Integration With Financial Systems
Ripple’s work with banks and payment firms continues to set XRP apart. The company has established corridors that enable faster regional and international transfers. These corridors demonstrate the real-world use of XRP as a liquidity bridge asset.
Levi emphasized this distinction, noting that XRP is “more integrated into the financial systems,” which he believes strengthens its long-term relevance.
Real-World Utility Versus Digital Gold
Bitcoin remains unmatched as decentralized digital gold. Its appeal lies in scarcity, security, and store-of-value strength. XRP takes a different approach. It functions as a utility token designed to move value efficiently across global systems.
These contrasting roles make the comparison complex, yet Levi insists XRP “is simply just a better product in every single category.” His view focuses on utility over narrative and on adoption over ideology.
The Road Ahead
Predicting which asset will become “bigger” depends on how one defines the term. Bitcoin leads in market capitalization and global recognition, and that advantage remains significant.
XRP’s path relies on increasing real-world adoption, deeper financial integration, and broader regulatory clarity. If global banks continue seeking faster settlement solutions, XRP’s role could expand dramatically.
Levi’s bold claim challenges long-standing assumptions in crypto. His message is clear: investors must evaluate assets through measurable performance and real utility.
Whether XRP eventually surpasses Bitcoin remains uncertain, but the comparison is no longer driven by hype. It now reflects a changing financial landscape where speed, efficiency, and integration matter more than ever.