In October 2025, Ethereum core developer Péter Szilágyi reignited centralization debates by accusing Vitalik Buterin and insiders of controlling Ethereum's direction, sparking considerable community discussion.
The event underscores governance tensions affecting Ethereum's perceived decentralization, though significant immediate market impacts remain unobserved, highlighting the ecosystem's resilience amid internal debates.
Szilágyi Challenges Buterin's Control Over Ethereum
Péter Szilágyi, a prominent Ethereum developer, posted a letter on GitHub criticizing the concentration of power. He claimed an "inner circle" led by Vitalik Buterin controls development within Ethereum.
Vitalik Buterin responded to these claims, suggesting Ethereum governance is more decentralized than described. Key insiders and founders, including Polygon’s founder, participated in the debate. Buterin stated, "Ethereum governance is more decentralized than critics claim and leadership input is balanced with broad ecosystem feedback."
Debate Unfolds on Ethereum’s Governance Transparency
The allegations have sparked wide debate, stirring community discussion about Ethereum's governance and transparency. However, market signals and participation remain stable without immediate on-chain disturbances recorded.
Despite the internal discord, financial impacts such as changes in Ethereum grants or compensation structures have not been formally reported. ETH price trends remain unaffected by this governance controversy.
Centralization Concerns Resurface After Past Ethereum Controversies
Centralization concerns have periodically emerged in Ethereum's history, with similar debates occurring during the DAO fork in 2016 and the EIP-1559 adoption in 2021. These incidents often led to strengthened governance processes.
Based on historical instances, significant governance changes could be anticipated if the debate continues. However, Ethereum's stability through past challenges suggests continuity in its core operations.