Banks are experiencing early adoption challenges with ISO 20022’s hybrid postal address format, which went into effect last month. As a result, the Payments Market Practice Group (PMPG) has published guidelines aimed at addressing the lack of data quality.
ISO 20022 has assumed several roles in supporting various payment and settlement processes, including cross-border wire transfers and securities transactions. It provides more detailed, structured, and machine-readable information to be carried in payment messages, which the older formats could not efficiently support.
However, just weeks into full enforcement, banks are grappling with real-world disruptions. Although the large institutions, including the top 175 SWIFT members that handle 80% of the volume, largely met the deadline, smaller and mid-tier banks report ongoing issues.
Adoption rates are hovering around 80-90% globally. Surveys show 10-18% of FIs in EMEA/NA and 7.5% in APAC said they weren’t ready before the deadline, leading to immediate operational strains.
Core Banking Systems Struggle with ISO 20022 Data Structures
According to reports, poor data quality is often attributed to hybrid address formats. Enhanced fields, like structured addresses, go beyond the old limits. This cuts off data in transitions and creates compliance holes in sanctions screening.
BREAKING: Banks appear to be experiencing issues with the hybrid address introduced in #ISO20022. As reported by @DPS_Gruppe, the Payments Market Practice Group (PMPG) has therefore published guidelines aimed at addressing the lack of data quality. https://t.co/LUnnBK2sR3
— Payment Infrastructure News (@payment_infrast) December 10, 2025
Non-compliant messages are also being rejected immediately. This causes delays in cross-border transactions and forces manual interventions. Banks that rely on Swift’s short-term translation solutions experience “lossy” changes, which means important data is either cut off or lost. This has led to many failed payments.
As of early December, “ripple effects” in correspondent banking networks, with isolated non-adopters causing problems in whole chains. Smaller US banks and those in developing markets report that up to 10% of payments are stalling, which is harming customer trust and incurring recovery costs.
Additionally, decades-old core banking systems can’t natively handle ISO 20022’s XML-based data structures. This is causing costly middleware or full replacements. Batch-to-real-time processing shifts have exposed vulnerabilities in end-to-end chains, with 48% of banks identifying this as their top hurdle.
Regional differences make it challenging to perform multiple transfers simultaneously. Emerging markets are lagging, forcing non-STP processes to adapt. According to BIS data, 50% of central banks were behind schedule by mid-2025, which caused “operational headaches” such as payments that couldn’t be processed.
If partners demand native ISO support, banks say they will be cut off from global flows, and their image will suffer. However, 97% of compliant cross-border flows now benefit from reduced failures and STP rates up 20-30%.
PMPG Releases Guidelines for Hybrid Postal Addresses
The Payments Market Practice Group (PMPG) has released a new guide for banks on Hybrid Postal Addresses, including a grace period. This gave banks helpful guidance on how to get through the ISO 20022 transition period, which runs from November 2025 to November 2026.
The guide addresses increasing data quality issues surrounding hybrid addresses, including the misuse of fields, missing mandatory information, and duplicate information. These issues can lead to rework, delays, and increased screening risk.
By 2026, all unorganized addresses will be thrown away as part of the change. By 2027, new E&I messages camt.110/111 will be in use, and the move of MT101, MT9xx, and other message groups will be done by 2028 at the latest.
Some banks are already on the move. For instance, Deutsche Bank stressed that starting in 2026, there will be yearly changes based on ISO 20022. This means that new validation rules and stricter data quality standards will come into effect.
Market platforms like T2 are changing their policies and release cycles to make sure they follow ISO 20022 requirements. The new FATF standards and CPMI harmonization criteria also mean that the data model needs to be changed.
To that end, the industry is now transitioning from migration to harmonization, focusing on data quality and the comprehensive utilization of the structured standard.