Moving money across Southern Africa is far more complex than the transfer fee displayed on a receipt. The region’s remittance market is expected to reach US$2.27 billion in 2025, rising to nearly US$3 billion by 2030, driven by millions of users who rely on cross-border flows for trade, family support, and small business operations.
Yet despite this growth, Southern Africa remains one of the most expensive remittance corridors in the world. Sending money within the region can cost between 12% and 25%, with transfers originating from South Africa ranking among the highest. The burden is especially heavy for rural households, which receive 30 – 40 percent of all remittance inflows and often must travel long distances to cash-out points, adding transport costs and time to already high fees.
But the financial fee is only the beginning. Behind every cross-border transfer lie deeper structural challenges, including liquidity delays, FX losses, operational bottlenecks, compliance slowdowns, and settlement failures, all of which collectively define the real economic cost of moving money across the SADC region.
The Hidden Costs Behind Southern Africa’s Cross-Border Payments
The true cost of moving money across the SADC region is shaped by structural fragmentation, including multiple currencies, non-interoperable systems, and inconsistent settlement processes. These factors create a ripple effect that affects everyone, from informal traders to large enterprises.
High Fees and FX Losses
Southern Africa operates across more than a dozen currencies, including the kwacha (ZMW, MWK), rand, pula, metical, lilangeni, and others. When money crosses borders, it rarely moves directly from one currency to another. Instead, it often passes through USD or ZAR.
Each hop adds a conversion spread, and each conversion reduces the final received amount. This layered FX process is why intra-SADC remittances can consume 12% to 25% of the principal amount, often before the recipient has touched a single kwacha or pula.
Settlement Delays and Liquidity Pressure
Cross-border payments often pass through multiple intermediaries, including banks, switches, aggregators, and mobile operators, each with its own approval processes and transaction cycles.
This results in settlement times ranging from one to five business days, depending on the specific corridor. For businesses, these delays freeze working capital. A payment from South Africa to Malawi that stalled over the weekend can halt inventory purchases or delay salaries, even if the transfer fee itself was reasonable.
Operational Burden and Manual Reconciliation
Because SADC payment systems are not interoperable, Zambia’s mobile money ecosystem does not integrate seamlessly with those in Zimbabwe or Malawi. Consequently, finance teams must manually reconcile:
- •Wallet transactions,
- •POS settlements,
- •Bank alerts,
- •Cross-border remittance confirmations.
This operational overhead rarely appears on a balance sheet, yet it consumes hours of staff time, increases the risk of error, and slows down businesses that operate across borders.
Inconvenience for Recipients and System Downtime
In markets like Zimbabwe and Malawi, approximately 80–90 percent of first-mile transactions remain cash-based. Limited liquidity at cash-out points or agent downtime can delay access to funds by days.
Meanwhile, uncoordinated KYC rules, inconsistent compliance checks, and network failures introduce frequent transaction reversals and failed settlement loops. A failed payment does not simply delay money; it undermines trust and destabilizes livelihoods.
Why Southern Africa Faces These Challenges
Southern Africa’s payment complexity is not accidental; it is structural.
The region has strong digital adoption, with mobile money giants such as MTN MoMo, Airtel Money, EcoCash, and regional POS ecosystems expanding rapidly. But these systems developed within national borders, not across them.
As a result:
- •Mobile wallets are not interoperable across SADC countries.
- •Banks rely on batch settlement, not real-time systems.
- •Cross-border rails, such as SADC-RTGS (formerly SIRESS), primarily support banks, rather than wallets or merchant ecosystems.
- •Each country has separate licensing rules, compliance frameworks, and currency controls.
These silos ensure that cross-border payments require multiple hops, approvals, or conversions, each introducing delay and cost.
Why Integration, Not More Tools, Is the Solution
Southern Africa is not short of payment tools. What it lacks is the ability for these tools to work together. Every country in the region has mobile money platforms, banking apps, POS ecosystems, and digital wallets, but each operates in its own silo. Adding more apps to this landscape won’t reduce fragmentation; it simply multiplies it.
Real progress will come from connecting the systems that already exist. That means building interoperable rails that allow businesses to move money across borders without manual intervention, creating shared settlement layers that reduce delays, and supporting multi-currency flows that reflect the region’s economic reality.
It also requires cross-wallet connectivity, so that a payment made in Lusaka can be received seamlessly in Lilongwe or Harare without routing through multiple intermediaries.
How Businesses Can Lower the Cost of Sending Money Across Southern Africa
Businesses need to operate across borders, currencies, and payment ecosystems without carrying the burden of complexity. This is where integrated solutions become vital.
Through a single integration, businesses can:
- •Accept mobile money, cards, and cash.
- •Reconcile payments in real time.
- •Operate across currencies such as ZAR, ZMW, MWK, and USD.
- •Reduce delays caused by multi-hop approval systems.
- •Maintain stringent standards with PCI DSS certification and built-in fraud monitoring.
Instead of adding another tool to an already crowded ecosystem, focusing on interoperability helps businesses streamline payment flows and thereby lower the cost of sending money across the SADC region.
As Arur Mildov, Chief Visionary Officer at Velex Group, puts it:
Africa doesn’t need more payment systems; it needs connected ones.
This philosophy is embodied by solutions that reduce costs, eliminate operational friction, and support businesses that operate across borders, where payments must be fast, predictable, and reliable.
Conclusion
When sending money across Southern Africa, fees are only one part of the cost equation. The deeper costs—delay, friction, FX loss, operational burden, and lost productivity—shape the economic reality of sending money across Southern Africa.
For businesses, the path forward is clear: connected payment infrastructure is no longer optional; it is essential.
Contributing to this shift means building the underlying infrastructure that helps merchants, platforms, and enterprises reduce settlement time, improve liquidity, and manage payments across Southern Africa with confidence.
If your business relies on regional transactions, now is the time to explore smarter infrastructure that lowers both cost and complexity.