An Uncertain Future For U.S. Banks Amid The Rise Of Paid Stablecoins

The Rise of Yield-Bearing Stablecoins and Potential Deposit Outflows

Brian Moynihan, CEO of Bank of America, has voiced a significant concern: the growing popularity of yield-bearing stablecoins could lead to a substantial outflow of deposits from traditional banks. This innovation poses a potential disruption to the American financial system, impacting the core function of banks as lenders.

During a recent earnings call, Moynihan explicitly stated that if stablecoin issuers are permitted to offer interest on their products, it could trigger a massive withdrawal of deposits from the American banking system.

He explained that these products would function more like money market funds, which are typically backed by cash or Treasury bills but are not utilized for financing loans.

Moynihan, referencing studies cited by the U.S. Treasury, estimated that as much as $6 trillion in deposits could potentially shift to these rewarded stablecoins. This migration could directly jeopardize the stability of bank financing.

Such a scenario carries several direct and profound consequences for the American economy:

• •
  A significant reduction in the lending capacity of banks, particularly for those that heavily depend on deposits to fund their operations.
• •
  An escalation in borrowing costs for both households and businesses, stemming from the scarcity of liquidity within the banking system.
• •
  A disproportionate impact on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which often have limited access to capital markets and primarily rely on traditional bank lending.
• •
  An increased systemic risk if deposit flows accelerate without an appropriate regulatory framework to govern these emerging financial products.

These potential effects underscore a concern shared by traditional banking institutions, which are apprehensive about the emergence of direct competition to their deposit-taking activities, an area that has historically been relatively protected.

Regulatory Tensions and Sector Rivalries Surrounding Stablecoins

Beyond the economic implications, political impasses surrounding the CLARITY Act have exacerbated existing tensions.

This proposed legislation, intended to establish a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, has seen its vote postponed again by the Senate Banking Committee. The official reason given is to allow for further bipartisan discussions. However, deep divisions persist, particularly concerning the possibility of allowing stablecoin issuers or platforms to offer yields.

The cryptocurrency industry itself is also experiencing internal divisions on this matter. Brian Armstrong, the CEO of Coinbase, has indicated that the platform might withdraw its support for the bill. He argues that the current version would favor banks by enabling them to effectively "kill rewards on stablecoins."

In a post on X, Armstrong asserted that the bill, as it is currently drafted, would grant banks the authority to obstruct any form of competition. He concluded that "it's better to have no law at all than a bad law." In contrast, Chris Dixon, a managing partner at a16z Crypto, advocates for supporting the CLARITY Act despite its flaws, emphasizing the necessity of regulatory progress for the United States to maintain its position as a hub for crypto innovation.

While Bank of America highlights the risks associated with yield-bearing stablecoins, JPMorgan has called for their regulation to safeguard the integrity of the banking system. This ongoing debate on crypto regulation has the potential to reshape the future of finance, blurring the lines between innovation and security.